data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b23e/1b23e15f336025a75d6cb85b0adf0f091de078af" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d23/92d23745a35760cd54cb0fe535c9bb7fc4d9050d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f060/0f0606e8b45943141f26da00e115acd4fe41e35f" alt=""
There's a lot of buzz lately about artiss creating work digitally...as in some companies now have that as a requirement. Here are some examples that I created digitally 100%. But what I'm confused about is why. What's the difference between doing a painting and scanning it, and creating it 100% in Photoshop. I'd flatten the layers anyway. Do they want the "digital" look? Do they think they have better control over color spaces? I don't actually render the same digital vs. traditional. It's not fun to try to make a digital painting look like a watercolor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09b87/09b87517d83447b402f350078e108f80e61e7260" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ba6/63ba68d46be564c0cd6c91be84bca9fa7f19a537" alt=""
Below is an image I painted traditonally and then scanned in and modified in Photoshop with layers and filters. . Is it digital? Why or why not?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf596/cf596ef00fe820c445fdf60de3690da0b74aea77" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment